The FCC wants to change Net Neutrality rules and destroy your internet

Cable companies and other large conglomerates are spending heavily on their war chests. Whether you know it or not, there is currently a war going on with the internet. It is the battle over Net Neutrality. The FCC is currently proposing changes to Net Neutrality rules that will strip away provisions and have a deep impact on your experience of the internet, and it won’t be good.

Net Neutrality proposed rulingNet Neutrality and proposed changes

Taken as a direct quote from Wikipedia, “Net neutrality (also network neutrality or Internet neutrality) is the principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication.”

Over the last few years the FCC, heavily lobbied by cable companies, has proposed changing the net neutrality rules.  The FCC’s proposal would be a huge boon for the cable companies, and would undermine the Internet as we know it. Under the proposed rules, cable giants like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon would be able to create a two-tiered Internet, with slow lanes (for most of us) and fast lanes (for wealthy corporations that are willing pay fees in exchange for fast service). Cable companies would have the power to discriminate against online content and applications — they could pick winners and losers, shake sites down for fees, block content for political reasons, and make it easier for Internet users to view content the cable companies own.

This new proposal would require Internet service providers to provide a vaguely defined minimum level of service to all legal applications and websites, but it would not prevent ISPs from charging companies for faster access to Internet users. Net neutrality advocates argue that so-called “fast lanes” will divide the Internet into different tiers, with deep-pocketed companies having unfair advantages over smaller ones. But the FCC isn’t allowed to issue stronger restrictions on fast lanes unless it takes the controversial step of reclassifying broadband as a utility or “common carrier” service.

The FCC received more than 1 million comments from the public, with “around two-thirds of commenters object[ing] to the idea of paid priority for Internet traffic, or division of Internet traffic into separate speed tiers,” according to the Sunlight Foundation. Reply comments are being accepted by the FCC until September 15.

The Internet Slowdown Protest

To combat the proposed Net Neutrality rule changes, some of the biggest tech companies will lead a symbolic “Internet Slowdown” protest. It will happen on September 10. It won’t be a real slowdown; instead, sites will install widgets “display[ing] prominent messages that include an infinitely-spinning ‘site loading’ icon—or the so-called ‘spinning wheel of death’—to symbolize what surfing the web could be like without net neutrality,” Fight for the Future said. “These alerts will direct the sites’ users to call and/or e-mail policymakers in support of net neutrality.”

If you are interested in joining the protest, go to where you can download the website widget, send push notifications to mobile app users, change your social media profile picture, or share their photos.

Share with others!Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn0Share on Google+239Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Kenny Withers

I am a blogger, strategist and speaker who works with companies to optimize their online personal and company presence, brand, internet marketing and social media marketing. This blog covers topics related to Social Media, Digital Marketing, Blogging, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Search Engine Marketing (SEM), Brand Marketing, and Content Marketing.

14 Responses

  1. Charolette Scorfield says:

    Hello there, I found your weblog using MSN. This is an extremely well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and
    return to learn more of your helpful information. Thank you for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  2. Jame Baecker says:

    This article really has a lot of information and facts I wanted concerning this subject.

  3. Jeanne Burdine says:

    I have an idea.

    Instead of getting all these promises and deals for Comcast to act like a common carrier, why not simply have the FCC reclassify them as a common carrier.

    Problem solved.

  4. Keeley Israel says:

    Then we let them get bigger and even more entrenched as a giant vampire squid on the aorta of critical communications infrastructure on the promise that they’ll keep not doing anything bad that might cause the USA problems.

  5. Damon Huish says:

    Personally, I think that every local cable company should be it’s own corporation, owned by its customers. Any company that gets special access to customers due to Franchise Agreements should be locally owned. This solves the whole problem, since the customer is the boss. Literally.

  6. Frederic Devito says:

    I fully endorse everything we can do to keep the neutrality issue in the public eye. We can’t rest until proper net neutrality legislation that protects the consumer’s interest is in place.

  7. Carey Burgess says:

    If the current head of the FCC isn’t a shill that will be the path they will take. Will be interesting to see if it happens because it would kill the big incentive for AT&T to switch their voice network over to IP.

  8. Caren Canfield says:

    Well goodbye innovation, hello stagnation.

  9. Samara Troiano says:

    Maybe just maybe, this will cause the FCC to take another look at this and do it right this time. I guess we will see what the new chairman really thinks.

  10. Klaus Donohoe says:

    I’m really inspired with your writing talents and the layout for your blog. Keep up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to peer a nice blog like this one nowadays.

  11. Antonio Desantis says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I’ll probably be returning to see more, thanks for the advice!

  12. Philip Deamer says:

    Awesome content you post here! I hope the FCC stays course on this issue.

  13. M Ace says:

    Appreciating the commitment you put into your website and detailed information you offer. It’s great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same out of date rehashed information. Wonderful read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.|

  1. November 13, 2014

    Netflix may have not had to pay for a “fast lane” but they had to pay for “a lane” period. That is wrong. I already paid for that lane, I paid to access the content they deliver.